By Barbara Plester
This booklet discusses obstacles for organizational humour in addition to the jokers and jesters that liven up smooth offices. It has lengthy been authorized that humour and tragedy can occupy an analogous area and that's eloquently confirmed during this booklet. utilizing ethnographic examine innovations, a range of news, ruminations, cartoons, and narratives of occasions is mixed with theoretical conceptions of humour and enjoyable to create a finished research of the great, the undesirable, and the downright gruesome in organizational humour.
Read or Download The Complexity of Workplace Humour: Laughter, Jokers and the Dark Side of Humour PDF
Best textbooks books
The best way to plan and deal with your individual funds, in attaining a financially profitable lifestyles, and take accountability as a citizen. own monetary LITERACY is aligned with the Jump$tart Coalition's nationwide criteria for private monetary Literacy. the private concentration of this path makes it proper and significant to all; specifically, to these simply beginning down the trail to non-public monetary independence.
Offers a comparatively short advent to conjugate duality in either finite- and infinite-dimensional difficulties. An emphasis is put on the elemental significance of the recommendations of Lagrangian functionality, saddle-point, and saddle-value. common examples are drawn from nonlinear programming, approximation, stochastic programming, the calculus of adaptations, and optimum keep watch over
E-book by way of Dukes, P
Extra resources for The Complexity of Workplace Humour: Laughter, Jokers and the Dark Side of Humour
Infant Behavior & Development, 17(1), 23–35. O’Connell, W. E. (1960). The adaptive functions of wit and humor. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 79(2), 183–187. Plester, B. A. (2009). Crossing the line: Boundaries of workplace humour and fun. Employee Relations, 31(6), 584–599. Plester, B. , & Winquist, J. (2015). The fun paradox. Employee Relations, 37(1), 380–398. , & Rhodes, C. (2013). Parody, subversion and the politics of gender at work: The case of Futurama’s ‘Raging Bender’. Organization, 20(4), 512–533.
Sometimes even targeted jokes about race or sexism are enjoyed and can even foster greater collegiality and inclusion. In some of my earlier research I found that people in most workplaces enjoy ‘taking the piss’ (participants’ phrase) out of each other in a form of targeted humour that jests about highly personal characteristics and behaviours. I found that banter is the most commonly shared form of humour inside the workplaces I studied. The employees that I talked to ardently asserted that being teased by colleagues was a sign of inclusion in their workgroup or team, and those that were not teased were considered ‘outsiders’ in work contexts (see Plester & Sayers, 2007).
Foot, H. C. ). (1976). Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications. London: John Wiley & Sons. References 15 Clark, L. , & Watson, D. (2008). Temperament: An organizing paradigm for trait psychology. In J. P. Oliver, R. W. Robins, & L. A. , pp. 265–286). New York: Guilford Press. , & Sons. (2003). ). Glasgow: HarperCollins. Collinson, D. (1988). ‘Engineering humour’: Joking and conflict in shop-floor relations. Organization Studies, 9, 181–199. Collinson, D. L. (1992). Managing the shopfloor: Subjectivity, masculinity and workplace culture.
The Complexity of Workplace Humour: Laughter, Jokers and the Dark Side of Humour by Barbara Plester